This Bill is paying for emergency ground transportation services IF you are a QUALIFIED Medi-Cal recipient OR certain low-income persons. Let me try to understand this. If ObamaCare is deemed unConstitutional, why are states like California approving Bills that would enslave all California taxpayers with the responsibility of paying for services to certain low income persons and Medi-Cal recipients? Mind you, I am NOT rich by any means but you and I will be paying for this. If I were to lose my insurance coverage, just because I saved money and put money in a savings account and be responsible for myself and family, I would NEVER qualify for this benefit. I THINK that you would consider me the middle-class family that is disappearing. Why? Because it would benefit the liberals GREATLY if I became low income and dependent on the government so that I start voting for them so I continue getting handouts. Like most government agencies now, they would include wording in their social benefits bills like "certain low-income persons." This wording is to enable them to pick and choose WHO gets approved for such benefits. Just like they give waivers to some people or groups from being charged certain taxes and fees based on WHO they are and WHO they know. Whenever you apply for anything through the government agencies, and they turn you down, ask them questions. Demand some answers. Don't take "no" right away. Let them explain it to you. Government employees...they know what I am talking about. It's easy to exclude people and groups for what they represent (especially the TEA Party groups) but get the aggressive OWS in front of them and they buckle. All the time. Knowing that they are representing Obama and the Democrat Party. Tell me it isn't so, Chino City Council - that includes Mayor Yates. |







